-
Website
http://politics.drumsnwhistles.com/ -
Original page
http://politics.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/05/open-letter-to-senator-clinton-2/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mollyfud
7 comments · 1 points
-
empireofno
5 comments · 4 points
-
Marie Carnes
9 comments · 1 points
-
WebPixie
6 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
207 comments · 44 points
-
-
Popular Threads
But I can't imagine voting McCain and his 100 more years in Iraq either.
I'm afraid if HRC gets the nod, the Democratic party will simply implode.
Desperately seeking optimism, hope and truth,
Jane
That didn't strike me as particularly crazy on her part. If legit, it strikes me as calculated. I've watched Rove do this; I teach a writing course based around media criticism, and it became a kind of scavenger hunt for my students to see what Rove or some other proxy was accusing someone of, and then to trace how that was actually being done by the administration. It was fun -- I didn't have to introduce any politics, just offer up as much info as possible, and the students started to find the rhetorical patterns (there's a good one between Rove, Rumsfeld, and who was actually talking to insurgents in Baghdad).
By calling out the other side and accusing them of something your side has done, it deflects and confuses the shallow investigation arm of the media.
So knowing that the person who organized Wright's speech was an enthusiastic Clinton supporter, and that Wright was familiar with the Clinton's probably before he knew much about Obama (there were photos of Wright with the Clintons from the 90's), I wonder if Wright was encouraged by people closer to Clinton, and if Ferraro's comment -- if it happened -- was a Roveroo (Karl Rove Switcheroo).
@MissM, I thought like you did. But the problem I have is that if Hillary Clinton were to get the nomination, and I were to vote for her and she won, the message left behind would be a solid warning to any politician who chose to run for office in an ethical and upright fashion. That message is "only dirty politics win".
A victory by Hillary Clinton is no victory at all. It would mean losing all those engaged new Democrats to apathy or the Republicans. It encourages the incompetent and biased reporting we've seen throughout this primary season.
It gives legitimacy to illegitimate practices, and that's why I finally had to agree with Steve -- not rewarding bad behavior, even when it's painful, is the better choice.
As to continued engagement of the citizenry, I've come to the conclusion that apathy is rampant. I believe that Obama is the antidote, with his message of hope and what America can be, but isn't now.
I'm praying that she will be a non-issue soon and I won't have to think about voting or not voting for her. I don't believe anything she says so who's to say there will be real difference between her and McCain?
Heaven help us help ourselves!