<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bang the Drum - Latest Comments in John Edwards: Candid and Informal</title><link>http://bangthedrum.disqus.com/</link><description>politics and issues</description><atom:link href="https://bangthedrum.disqus.com/john_edwards_candid_and_informal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:24:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: John Edwards: Candid and Informal</title><link>http://politics.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/12/john-edwards-candid-and-informal/#comment-3779151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Edwards is great but I just don't know what has changed since 2004 except that he is two years older.  The more I think about the Dems in 2008, the more I think the nomination is Al Gore's to lose: he was robbed in 2000, has been consistently right on Iraq (unlike Hillary), and will not have a problem with either cash or name recognition... I wrote a story on this at &lt;a href="http://www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com"&gt;www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MinorRipper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:24:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>